![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Religion: |
||||||||||||||||||
Yahweh is lying. The modern Christian interpretation of the Garden of Eden is all wrong. The original story doesn't make any sense to people raised on the Greek philosophers' idea that God is perfect, so modern readers have to misinterpret it to make it square with Platonic theology. The story, however, makes perfect sense as the story of a manipulative, jealous deity. Indeed, the story comes from a time when deities were more often thought of as jealous and powerful than as good and just (see Zeus, et al). The modern misreading of the story is that the snake tricks Eve into eating the apple, and that Yahweh punishes Adam and Eve for being disobedient by, among other things, taking away the Tree of Life. The real story, however, is clear if you read it with an open mind.
[Yahweh finds out about the tree of knowledge and curses the snake, the woman, and the man. This is the "just so" section that explains why snakes don't have legs, why women have to do what men say, why men have to labor, etc.]
First, Yahweh says that Adam and Eve shouldn't eat the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. He doesn't say, "Because I command you not to eat the fruit." He says, "Because it will kill you the very day that you eat it." That's not true, but Yahweh says so because he doesn't want humans eating the fruit and gaining understanding of good and evil. He doesn't mind them eating the Tree of Life and living forever, so long as they remain ignorant and thus inferior to him. Then the snake (who's a clever creature but not Satan) tells Eve the truth about the "poisonous" fruit: it won't kill you, it will make you wise like Yahweh. She and Adam eat the fruit and they see that the snake is telling the truth. When Yahweh finds out, he's angry. Like a dysfunctional parent or pagan deity caught in a lie, he punishes Adam and Eve. Paradoxically and unfairly, he punishes them for what they did before they knew good from evil. As to the Tree of Life, he removes it from the garden not to punish Adam and Eve but because he's afraid that if they eat its fruit they'll become too powerful. As the idea of God has changed over time, the selfish, deceitful, vengeful actions of Yahweh have become unbelievable. A veil of misinterpretation has been drawn over the story, so that by the time anyone reads Genesis for themselves they've already been coached to misunderstand it. JoT PS: It's noteworthy that among the curses YHWH levels against Adam and Eve, he doesn't mention that they and their descendents will spend eternity being tortured after they die. That's a lot worse than suffering during childbirth or being forced to labor for three score and ten years. Why doesn't YHWH mention the ultimate penalty? Because it's a pagan idea not found in the Bible.
PPS: Harris, in Understanding the Bible, suggests that YHWH not killing Man and Eve could be considered His first act of mercy. That seems like another fair assessment. (JoT, Sep 07) Cain's Sin: another account from Gensis that confounds modern sensibilities Samson the Terrorist: another reading of the Old Testament that fails to square with Sunday School St. Paul was Satan's Dupe: who was that spirit of light, really? Plato's Myth of Heaven and Hell: another example of Greek thinking in popular Christian theology |
||||||||||||||||||