![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Religion: |
||||||||||||||||||
You hear anti-gay Christians quoting the Bible to justify anti-gay laws and practices, declaring homosexuality a sin forbidden by God. They say that they're not expressing popular opposition to homosexuality but speaking the unchanging word of God. But you don't hear them railing against the sin of having sex while a woman is menstruating. They don't call for schools to teach that menstrual sex is abnormal. They don't support the right to discriminate against people who practice menstrual sex. They don't call for laws against this behavior. It's not as though the proscription of menstrual sex is a mere formality. Ezekiel refers to menstrual sex (but not homosexuality) to praise those who avoid it and condemn those who practice it.
Plenty of Christians will say that Jesus liberated us from the law, which is why we don't need to get circumcised and why we can eat shrimp. That's not a self-contradictory reading. The contradiction only shows up when Christians quote the Old Testament to condemn homosexuality but let heterosexuals slide on the menstrual sex deal. So why do the Christians who rag on gays not also rag on heterosexuals who "uncover the fountain of blood"? Because they are expressing a popular prejudice rather than the unchanging word of God. JoT 1. Here Ezekiel is contradicting earlier scripture in which it is said that children suffer for the sins of their fathers to seven generations. Ezekiel, in this and nearby verses, is saying that YHWH metes out reward and punishment for what a man does, not what a one's father or forefathers have done. These verses also mention another forgotten sincharging interest on loans. Don't hear much about that sin from Christian leaders these days, either.
|
||||||||||||||||||